Update 2016-05-29
What an unexpected update! The May PSD meeting inadvertently answered my question about how LC prefers to handle these specific situations.
Human Torch (Fictitious characters)
The Human Torch is a fictitious character that has various human identities over time. The Human Torch himself may have changed his looks over time, but it was still the same character. It is therefore not a group of fictitious characters according to LCSH, but a single one, which should be established in the name authority file as a pseudonym used by several persons. The proposal was not approved.
I can see situations where I think it’d be good to differentiate between identities. If you had a very large comic book collection in your library and a patron asked for the issues where Bucky was Captain America, having two name headings like “Captain America (Bucky Barnes)” and “Captain America (Steve Rogers)” would be useful. I can see how that could grow untenable though.
I guess I fundamentally disagree that the Human Torch has really been the ‘same character’ through his various iterations. I mean the first iteration of the Torch was a freakin’ robot! That’s certainly a different character than Johnny Storm.
So though I don’t agree with them that every person that uses a name should be grouped under a single heading — that’s their answer.
Next step my dear catalogers — GO FORTH and add them 400s!
The other day I was cataloging some trade paper backs of Ms. Marvel comics, and was deciding whether or not to use a 600 for the character herself (subdivided by $v Comic books, strips, etc. of course).
Hopping to the name authority file, I found Marvel, Ms. but noted that while “Danvers, Carol” is listed as a 400, “Khan, Kamala” is not.
I wasn’t sure if this identity (in the Library of Congress I mean, not for Marvel Comics Group and their attendant industries) was intended to represent all people ever known as “Marvel, Ms.” — a sort of collective pseudonym — and therefore usable to represent Khan’s incarnation of the character.
Having posed the question on twitter (and a big thanks to SofiaDistracted and Jessica for engaging with me on this, I checked a bunch of other NARs for comic characters whose names have been adopted by multiple people. Here are some findings:
- Batgirl (Fictitious character)
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name:
- Betty Kane (“Bat-Girl”)
- Barbara Gordon
- Helena Bertinelli
- Cassandra Cain
- Stephanie Brown
- 0 400s in the NAR
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name:
- Nightwing (Fictitious character)
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name
- Dick Grayson
- Tim Drake
- Damian Wayne
- 0 400s in the NAR
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name
- Robin, the Boy Wonder (Fictitious character)
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name
- Dick Grayson
- Jason Todd
- Tim Drake
- Stephanie Brown
- Damian Wayne
- 3 400s in the NAR
- Grayson, Dick (Fictitious character)
- Grayson, Richard John (Fictitious character)
- Robin (Fictitious character from Kane)
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name
- Captain Marvel (Fictitious character : Marvel Comics Group)
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name
- Mar-Vell
- Monica Rambeau
- Genis-Vell
- Phyla-Vell
- Khn’nr
- Noh-Varr
- Carol Danvers
- 8 400s in the NAR
- Mar-Vell (Fictitious character)
- Rambeau, Monica (Fictitious character)
- Genis-Veil (Fictitious character)
- Phyla-Vell (Fictitious character)
- Khn’nr (Fictitious character)
- Noh-Varr (Fictitious character)
- Danvers, Carol (Fictitious character)
- Marvel, Captain (Fictitious character : Marvel Comics Group)
- People who’ve assumed that mantle/name
So from these 4 examples…either the catalogers making the NAR didn’t care to add ANY alter-egos (poor Batgirl and Nightwing!), or they added one for the predominant identity only, or ALL the identities! So I can’t really conclude anything. Maybe I need a larger sample, help me, more knowledgable comics people:
What other names that have been held by multiple people? (for the record, as of ‘print’ time, The Flash, Green Lantern, Venom, Ant-Man, Spider-Woman — all of whom I know off the top of my head have had different people under a single identity — are not in the NAF)
I’m not suggesting that the NAF should differentiate between every person who grabs a name and a cape for twenty minutes. But at the very least, adding in the 400s will allow people who are searching for some of those names to find the character.
To muddy the waters a bit, I did come across the FAQ on pseudonyms from NACO — while this is obviously intended to apply to creators/contributors of works, and not really to subjects, rules A1.4-A1.6 could perhaps be interpreted to apply to this situation.
Whew. I’d love to hear any thoughts anybody has on this!